This site is intended for health professionals only
Monday 23 October 2017
Share |

Oral formulations for paediatrics: palatability studies

PRACTICAL THERAPEUTICS

 

Palatability studies are required for new medicines to ensure that they are acceptable to children. However, there is no gold standard method to conduct such studies

 

Hannah Batchelor

Pharmacy and Therapeutics Section,

College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Medical School Building,

University of Birmingham, UK 

Rebecca Venables

School of Pharmacy, Keele University,

Keele, UK

Sejal Ranmal

Catherine Tuleu

Department of Pharmaceutics,

UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK

Email: h.k.batchelor@bham.ac.uk

 

The palatability of paediatric medicines is one of the most important formulation factors with potential to influence adherence to therapeutic regimens and outcomes.1 Palatability has been defined as, “the overall appreciation of a (often oral) medicine by organoleptic properties such as vision (appearance), smell, taste, aftertaste and mouth feel (for example, texture, cooling, heating, trigeminal response) and possibly also sound (auditory clues)”.2 Although this paper focuses on palatability of oral formulations, it may also be an important aspect to consider for products designed for inhaled or nasal administration. The importance and incentive to study the palatability of paediatric formulations was discussed in the reflection paper3 and endorsed in the latest European paediatric guideline on pharmaceutical development of formulations for paediatric use.4

Taste was reported to be the most common reported barrier to oral medicines administration in a recent study on children with chronic diseases affecting 35% of all prescribed oral formulations.5 Studies show that making medications more pleasing to the child can have a positive effect on compliance.6 Market research has previously shown that fruity, sweet oral medicines are preferred by children; citrus and red berry flavours are preferred across Europe, liquorice in Scandinavia, while bubblegum and grape flavours were reported to be preferred in the US.7

Existing products where taste has been identified as an issue in children with chronic illnesses include ranitidine liquid, prednisolone soluble tablets and trimethoprim liquid.5

 

Methods to measure palatability

As the physiological development of children changes markedly with age, they should not be regarded as miniature adults, therefore involving children in studies investigating problems with paediatric medicines is essential.

Methods used most commonly to assess palatability have included scale methods such as visual analogue (VAS) and hedonic. Other methods have focused on a forced choice or preference between multiple products (ranking products in order of preferred taste), or a simple question as to whether the child would be prepared to take the medicine again. The prevalence of complaints or refusal to take the medicine was used to assess taste in one study.8 Another evaluated the time taken for a nurse to administer the medicine as a measure of acceptability, where it was stated that the average administration time was 60 seconds.9 For infants and very young children, an assessment of palatability can be performed by a nurse or parent noting the willingness to swallow. Further reviews on methods used to test acceptability are available.10,11

The methodology needs to be appropriate for the age and cognitive function of the child involved in the study; hedonic scales can be used in children as young as three years of age, whereas VAS are more widely used for children of six years and older.10 Open answer questionnaires are typically only suitable for older children who are judged able to articulate more detailed responses themselves. Age ranges for the use of hedonic scale and/or VAS are consistent with those used in pain management, an application that is widely used and validated, with children as young as three years of age using them effectively. However, there is no standard, globally acceptable approach for confirmation of formulation acceptability in children.  

 

Population

Children are considered to be the most appropriate sample population to test the acceptability of a new paediatric medicine, however ethical issues arise here including whether to use healthy volunteers, or current patients. This is supported by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH), who suggest that the views of children with regard to taste of medicines need to be investigated owing to differing perspectives between adults and children.12 A high quality palatability study relies upon the experience and training of the assessors and how the samples are presented. Although expert adults trained in sensory analysis may be considered the best to evaluate taste, children are the end users and it is known that taste preferences differ between adults and children.7 Therefore it is important that the study is designed to account for the fact that children are not ideal assessors.

 

Healthy versus ill children

Illness can affect taste and sensory perception, therefore in an ideal situation the palatability testing should be conducted in children with the condition to be treated. However, there is also a need to minimise the burden of clinical testing in children who are already dealing with illness. EU guidance states that although healthy children should not be involved in clinical trials, exceptions can be made for palatability studies for new flavoured medicines, particularly when a swirl and spit method is employed.13 In a review (unpublished review by authors) of palatability studies conducted in children, 16 out of 41 studies were undertaken using healthy children. Medicines testing in healthy children were antibiotics (seven studies); activated charcoal;3 oral rehydration solutions2 plus other commonly used OTC medicines.

 

Swish and spit methodology

A swish and spit (also known as swirl and spit) test is one where the product is taken into the mouth and then spat out rather than swallowed. This type of study can be beneficial in minimising the risk of adverse effects due to absorption of swallowed agents. However, it is important in such tests that the assessor is able to follow the instructions given, which may be difficult for very young children. Alternatively the taste is evaluated during routine clinical practice where the medicine is swallowed as required.

 

Sample size and acceptance criteria

Typical sample sizes in taste testing of medicines in children ranged from 20 to 965.10 Draft regulatory guidance on assessment of the palatability of veterinary medicinal products proposed that the overall voluntary acceptance rates should at least reach the threshold of 80% in dogs, and 70% for all other species. The threshold should be reached in a group of at least 50 animals in case the product is administered only once, and in a group of at least 25 animals in case of multiple administrations.14 Interestingly, there is no such threshold defined for human medicines but the current thinking is that it has to be acceptable to 80% of patients for the medicine to be deemed acceptable.

 

Number of samples tested

The EMA recommend a maximum of four samples to taste (the younger the child, the fewer samples).3 Single- or double-blinded, randomised studies are the preferred methodology, however this is not always possible due to the nature of the product itself, for example, comparisons of various flavour is easily unblinded. Taste studies that are nested within other clinical studies should be encouraged as a pragmatic approach to evaluate new formulations in children. 

 

Single or multiple exposures?

A review on palatability studies conducted in children reported that the majority were based on a single exposure to the medicine although there were a few studies that reported on palatability following exposure over a longer period (5–10 days).10 In all cases the palatability study should mimic typical clinical usage and therefore, multidose studies are more representative than single-dose studies for chronic treatments.

 

Conducting palatability studies

Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products (CTIMPs) must adhere to the European Clinical Trials Directive (2001/20/EC), the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004 and the Good Clinical Practice Directive (2005/28/EC). The rules and regulations that cover CTIMPs are extensive and it is critical to define whether a palatability test is a CTIMP study or not. Palatability is not a pharmacological effect, therefore the purpose of a palatability study falls outside this definition and such tests are not classified as CTIMPs.

 

However, when a palatability study is nested within another clinical study it may be classified as a CTIMP. It is essential to obtain guidance from local governance bodies to determine whether a palatability study will be classified as a CTIMP. Assessment of the palatability of medicines administered for routine clinical use would not be classified as CTIMP studies but would be subject to local research governance policies.

 

In vitro methods to assess palatability

Electronic taste sensing systems have been developed and used for taste evaluation in both the pharmaceutical and food/beverage industry. These ‘electronic tongues’ measure changes in electrical potential while testing liquid samples on sensors. They are non-specific and measure taste of any tastant, for example, drug and excipients. However there is a need to correlate electronic tongue data with human taste data in order to validate the suitability of the sensing system for taste evaluation of tastants (for example, drugs).

 

The measurement of the amount of drug released/dissolved in simulated oral cavity conditions can provide an indication about the taste of the drug as only dissolved drug molecules are able to interact with taste receptors on the tongue. However, analytical methods typically only measure drug concentrations and not those of other excipients so there may be a need to understand the taste of excipients as well as the drug in formulated medicines. In addition, the correlation to taste thresholds in children is required to adequately interpret this type of in vitro data.

 

Managing poorly palatable medicines in practice

Although there are currently regulations in place to ensure that any new medicines are acceptable and palatable to children it is acknowledged that there are several existing medicines where palatability is an issue. Consultation with healthcare professionals provided some advice in administration of medicines to children where palatability is an issue.15

  • Consider using a higher strength product to reduce the volume administered where the dose can still be accurately administered.
  • Consider a switch to tablets or capsules if the child is old enough. Children and their families should be involved when making decisions about treatment options, including choice of formulation. 
  • Consider alternative brands if possible and where taste is known to be different.
  • Consider mixing with food/using food immediately after administration.
  • Consider using an oral syringe to the back of the mouth to avoid the tongue in younger children. 
  • Consider undertaking ‘taste tests’ before prescribing, for example, flucloxacillin liquid is known to be unpalatable, therefore it is recommended that the child is observed swallowing a dose prior to full prescription.16

Conclusions and further work

It is acknowledged that further work is required to develop evidence-based methodology to assess palatability of medicines designed for children. It is anticipated that there will be regulatory guidance that will specify requirements for the design, conduct, and evaluation of palatability studies for all oral dosage forms developed for use in paediatric populations.

 

Key points

  • Poor palatability of oral medicines leads to poor adherence and sub-optimal clinical outcomes for children.
  • Children are the most relevant population to study taste as they are the target patients. 
  • Guidance on the conduct of palatability studies will enable a consistent framework approach. 
  • Healthcare professionals should consider palatability before making any prescribing or supply choices to paediatric patients.
  • Although there are several technologies available to assess taste in vitro, human taste panels are still regarded as the gold standard.

References

  1. Salunke S et al. European Paediatric Formulation Initiative’s (EuPFI) 2nd conference commentary—Formulating better medicines for children. Int J Pharmaceutics 2011;419(1-2):235–9.
  2. Kozarewicz P. Regulatory perspectives on acceptability testing of dosage forms in children. Int J Pharmaceutics 2014;469(2):245–8.
  3. European Medicines Agency. Reflection paper: formulations of choice for the paediatric population EMEA/CHMP/PEG/194810/2005. London 2006 [Feb 2015]. www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003782.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2015.
  4. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on pharmaceutical development of medicines for paediatric use EMA/CHMP/QWP/805880/2012. London2013 [31/04/2013]. http://nvkfb.nl/download/2013/Guideline%20on%20pharmaceutical%20developm....
  5. Venables R et al. Determination of formulation factors that affect oral medicines acceptability in a domiciliary paediatric population. Int J Pharmaceutics 2015;480(1–2):55–62.
  6. Winnick S et al. How do you improve compliance? Pediatrics 2005;115(6):e718–24.
  7. Strickley RG et al. Pediatric drugs—a review of commercially available oral formulations. J Pharm Sci 2008;97(5):1731–74.
  8. Stafford L et al. Comparison of pediatric steroid mixtures. Aus J Hosp Pharm 1998;28(4):246–9.
  9. Uhari M, Eskelinen L, Jokisalo J. Acceptance of antibiotic mixtures by infants and children. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1986;30(4):503–4.
  10. Davies EH, Tuleu C. Medicines for children: A matter of taste. J Pediatr 2008;153(5):599–604.e2.
  11. Squires LA et al. A systematic literature review on the assessment of palatability and swallowability in the development of oral dosage forms for pediatric patients. Ther Innov Reg Sci 2013;47(5):533–41.
  12. RCPCH. Safer and  Better Medicines for Children. London: 2004.
  13. EU. Ethical considerations for clinical trials on medicinal products conducted with the paediatric population (Recommendations of the ad-hoc group for the development of implementing guidelines for Directive 2001/20/EC relating to good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use). http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-10/ethical_considerations_.... Accessed 7 July 2015.
  14. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the demonstration of palatability of veterinary medicinal products. EMA/CVMP/EWP/206024/2011-CONSULTATION. 2013. www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/... (accessed 9 July 2015).
  15. Venables R. Determining the prevalence and nature of oral formulation-related barriers to medicines administration in paediatric patients suffering from chronic conditions. University of Birmingham; 2014.
  16. Baguley D et al. Prescribing for children – taste and palatability affect adherence to antibiotics: a review. Arch Dis Childhood 2012;97(3):293–7.

Ads by Google

You are leaving www.nursinginpractice.com

You are currently leaving the Nursing in Practice site. Are you sure you want to proceed?

Close

Respect for nurses: Sign up to our e-petition TODAY

The Nursing in Practice Respect campaign is now live! Over the coming months, we're set to highlight the vital contribution and efforts of primary care and community care nurses throughout the UK.

As part of our campaign, Nursing in Practice is looking to call on parliament to set up a debate to celebrate the vital work that you do.


GET INVOLVED: SIGN OUR E-PETITION

Close

Calling all primary care nurses! 'Like' our Nursing in Practice Facebook page to enter our free draw to win a £25 M&S voucher




http://www.facebook.com/NursinginPracticeMagazine